Patent Everything.
Then Give It Away.

Why I am building a full computing stack — from nanotube to operating system — and why the plan has always been to release it free.

There is a version of this story where I file the patents quietly, license the technology to a chipmaker, collect royalties, and move on. That version does not interest me.

Here is what actually interests me: building a complete computing stack — one device, one logic layer, one processor architecture, one memory system, one security module, one language, one operating system — from physical first principles. Proving, mathematically and by simulation, that every layer works. Filing the patents not to extract rent, but to establish authorship beyond dispute. And then, when the international filings are secured, releasing all of the software freely and permanently.

That is the plan. It has always been the plan.

What Was Built

The device is two carbon nanotubes — one inside the other. A metallic armchair single-wall carbon nanotube threaded inside a multi-wall carbon nanotube, separated by a 0.34 nanometre van der Waals gap. That is the entire structure.

When a photon strikes the outer tube, it detunes the inter-wall quantum coupling. The inner tube’s conductance rises. An alternating current voltage pulse on the terminals sets the direction of current: positive phase gives trit +1, negative phase gives trit −1, no signal gives trit 0. True balanced ternary. Three states, not two. The signal-to-noise ratio exceeds 2,000. This is not a hypothesis — it comes out of Landauer–Büttiker quantum transport simulation using the Non-Equilibrium Green’s Function formalism. The physics works. Exact current values are available under NDA.

Above that device sits a complete stack:

Every layer has been implemented. The ManiT compiler — 11,600 lines of Rust code, dual-target: Low Level Virtual Machine intermediate representation and the T3 Instruction Set Architecture — compiles and runs. The THATTEOS kernel boots. The T3 Instruction Set Architecture emulator executes ternary programs. The simulations — quantum transport, phonon spectra, optical response, atomic layer deposition, cache coherence, photonic cavity — are real physics, run on real simulation tools: Kwant, Quantum ESPRESSO, GPAW, LAMMPS, MEEP.

Six complete patent specifications have been filed with the Indian Patent Office (April 2026), covering the full hardware and software stack from the device through the operating system. Additional specifications covering the extended architecture are in preparation for filing.

Why Patents

Not because I want to be a patent troll. Not because I believe intellectual property is a natural right. Because authorship matters, and the patent system is the only mechanism society has built to establish it in a form that cannot later be rewritten.

I am one person, working alone, in Nashik. I have no institutional affiliation, no lab, no co-authors. If I release this freely without establishing priority, someone with more resources will file the patents, and the work will be attributed to them. That has happened before. It will happen again. Patents are the receipts.

Once the international priority window closes — April 2027 for the core six, and correspondingly for the extension patents — the strategic value of withholding is gone. At that point, open-sourcing costs nothing and benefits everyone.

Why Ternary

Because the universe does not operate in binary.

Binary computing is a historical accident — vacuum tubes were easier to stabilize in two states than three, so two states became the convention, and seventy years of engineering momentum locked it in. But balanced ternary (−1, 0, +1) is mathematically more natural: it is the numeral system closest to base e in information-theoretic efficiency, it encodes sign natively without a separate sign bit, and it eliminates the asymmetry between positive and negative that makes two’s complement arithmetic complicated.

More importantly: the device described above is natively ternary. The physics produces three states. Building a binary computer out of it would be like building a square wheel — technically possible, structurally wrong.

The Ravan Analogy

Before the Ramayan happened, the scholar Ravan — not the demon-king, but the Brahmin scholar — reconstituted the Vedas on Mahadev’s orders after they had been mutilated and almost got lost. He did not invent the knowledge. He gathered it, systematized it, proved it complete, and gave it back to humanity.

That is what this project feels like from the inside. The physics of carbon nanotubes, balanced ternary arithmetic, quantum transport — none of this is new. What is new is the synthesis: showing that these pieces fit together into a complete, coherent computing stack that works from first principles at every level. And the intent has always been to give it back.

What Happens Next

The international patent filings will be complete by early 2027. After that:

The device itself — fabricating a real single-wall carbon nanotube inside a multi-wall carbon nanotube ternary switch — requires a carbon nanotube growth facility, electron-beam lithography, and controlled-atmosphere contacts. That is not something one person can do in a home lab. What can be done is making the specifications and simulation evidence so complete that any lab with the right equipment can replicate it. That is the goal.

A Note on Scale

The total budget for this project — twelve patent specifications, all simulations, the compiler, the operating system — is under thirty lakh rupees (approximately thirty-five thousand United States dollars). No grants. No investors. No institutional overhead.

The physics tools are open source. The hardware is a workstation with two AMD Graphics Processing Units and an AMD processor, used for everything from quantum transport calculations to molecular dynamics simulations to compiler builds. The patents were filed without attorneys — after reading the Indian Patents Act carefully enough to understand what it actually requires.

None of this is mentioned to boast. It is mentioned because the standard story about deep-tech research requires a university, a lab, a team, and decades. This is a test of whether that story is true, or whether it is just institutional inertia dressed up as necessity.

The physics is right. The mathematics is consistent.
The implementation works in simulation.
That is enough to make the work real.

I do not know if the THATTE device will ever be fabricated commercially. I do not know if balanced ternary computing will displace Complementary Metal-Oxide-Semiconductor technology in my lifetime. What I know is that the work is real.

Patent everything. Then give it away.

That is the whole plan.

Key Points
  • The device: metallic single-wall carbon nanotube inside multi-wall carbon nanotube — two tubes, photon gate, alternating current encoding
  • Simulation result: trit switching confirmed, signal-to-noise ratio > 2,000, by Non-Equilibrium Green’s Function transport calculation. Exact values under NDA
  • Full stack implemented: gate library, processor, memory, security, ManiT language, THATTEOS kernel
  • Patents are receipts for authorship — not rent-seeking. Priority window closes April 2027
  • ManiT compiler and THATTEOS kernel will be open-sourced after international filings are complete
  • Total project budget under thirty lakh rupees. No grants. No team. No institutional overhead.
← Three Paradigms, One Device Latest Post
Licensing & NDA

Full Technical Brief Available Under NDA

Simulation data, quantum transport results, fabrication specifications, and complete patent claims are shared under mutual NDA only.
Minimum engagement: USD 100 million. IP held by Saptarang Ventures (OPC) (P) Ltd.

Request Mutual NDA → Licensing Tracks
Stay Updated

Subscribe to maniTLab

New research, patent updates, and essays — direct to your inbox. No spam, no tracking.

Get in Touch

Write to Manish

Research collaboration, licensing enquiries, technical questions, or press requests.

Replies to manish@manitlab.org